Yep.Mike wrote:Eireguy wrote:http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... mmer/34089
Diy jammer
The legalities of this might be worse than shooting them down.
FCC already made cell phone jammers illegal.
Yep.Mike wrote:Eireguy wrote:http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... mmer/34089
Diy jammer
The legalities of this might be worse than shooting them down.
Making it illegal worked with drugs right?Toddstang wrote:Yep.Mike wrote:Eireguy wrote:http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... mmer/34089
Diy jammer
The legalities of this might be worse than shooting them down.
FCC already made cell phone jammers illegal.
I see what you are saying but I have been trying to get a cell phone jammer for over 5 years now.WLJ wrote:Making it illegal worked with drugs right?Toddstang wrote:Yep.Mike wrote:Eireguy wrote:http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... mmer/34089
Diy jammer
The legalities of this might be worse than shooting them down.
FCC already made cell phone jammers illegal.
Just playing devil's advocate here.
Liars gonna lie.BIGC wrote:First statement from Boggs is that they were taking photos of a friends home, now he is saying that he was practicing so that he could use the drone to take pics of his kids motocross stuff....
hmmm...
jackalo626 wrote:Liars gonna lie.BIGC wrote:First statement from Boggs is that they were taking photos of a friends home, now he is saying that he was practicing so that he could use the drone to take pics of his kids motocross stuff....
hmmm...
Toddstang wrote:I see what you are saying but I have been trying to get a cell phone jammer for over 5 years now.WLJ wrote:Making it illegal worked with drugs right?Toddstang wrote:Yep.Mike wrote:Eireguy wrote:http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... mmer/34089
Diy jammer
The legalities of this might be worse than shooting them down.
FCC already made cell phone jammers illegal.
Just playing devil's advocate here.
I can get drugs any day of the week if I wanted to.
wheres netto...lets get his take on thisDave1965 wrote:Would it be the same if some weird guy was peeping in your windows by standing outside them?
Out buying a new dronessracer wrote:wheres netto...lets get his take on this
BINGO!jackalo626 wrote:He didn't use a 6.5 bolt gun and nobody was hurt nor where they going to be with what he chose. I don't applaud him for shooting a gun in the air but when push comes to shove I respect fight over flight in reality. He didn't go looking for the fight is the difference here, it was in his yard. If shooting a plane that is flying passengers miles above is the same thing to you as this drone in his back yard with a camera then I don't know what to say to you.
Flight log? Seriously think this guy is telling the truth?Fate0n3 wrote:Can you guys prove this drone was in his property??? Looking the flight log u can barely tell from the looks of after it shot it landed quite a bit off this gentleman's property. And who are u to say what he choose was a proper weapon... U guys are fucking killing me thinking discharging a gun in a neighborhood you can clearly see houses in the air was a good idea. Both are at fault plain and simple the craft should have been no where near his property. will we know the truth nooooooooo never. My point is doing shit like this makes ever respectable gun owner of america look bad plain and simple today several people at work were discussing this a few anti gun there comment "this is why guns don't need to be in the hands of everyone". This is my point plain and simple I have watch shotguns shoot slugs at steel plates well beyond 150 yds. I know he did not use a bolt gun but would it change ur thoughts if he did. You guys are thinking it was OK to discharge the firearm due to it was a shotgun that can't hit crap with his supposed round past 20yds. That is what is funny to me, my point was if u were the neighbor beside of him how would u feel someone letting shotgun rounds off in the air around ur family answer that for me?
Yes but u are still failing to read the point what I'd the gun owner wasn't shooting birdshot.........that is my point u are missing what if it was a slug or self defense ammo....would u want that flying in the air above ur family? We are taking what we read from a newspaper and his word that is what he shot. I guess people should go around neighborhoods and blast shot gun bird shot in the air and when people get pissed say oh it just birdshot can't hurt anyone falling see what the response will be.shaggy1392 wrote:Have you ever shot any birdshot? I have been dove hunting over 20 years and have been peppered with birdshot so many times I couldn't even begin to tell you. I'd can say with 100% confidence that the chance of anyone getting hurt by falling birdshot is 0.
Lets see, HMMM, neighbors (Witnesses) seem to have the same story as drone shooter, drone pilot has been changing his story 2 times and never turned over SD card to prove his innocence. SD card even damaged will still hold info.Fate0n3 wrote:I guess people just read what they want.....u guys are immediately taking that the drone is a liar and the gun shooter is being honest with what he shot. What if he wasn't shooting bird shot and it was something??????? That is the point here people why is one immediately a lair and the other honest Sam? I said earlier I agree birdshot at a distance is harmless... But can it be proved that is what he shot?????? I have said multiple times I do think the drone owner should have been over his property but my point is the reaction from the owner.
Kicker to me is if I had just discharged 3 shot gun rounds in the air I don't think I would be getting that hostile with police. I would think I would be trying to deescalate and explain and save my butt from going to jail......
OK let's say for a 100% you are correct like I said I dunno I do not believe in speculation but let's play this game u are correct does that give him the right to take the law into his hands???Toddstang wrote:Lets see, HMMM, neighbors (Witnesses) seem to have the same story as drone shooter, drone pilot has been changing his story 2 times and never turned over SD card to prove his innocence. SD card even damaged will still hold info.Fate0n3 wrote:I guess people just read what they want.....u guys are immediately taking that the drone is a liar and the gun shooter is being honest with what he shot. What if he wasn't shooting bird shot and it was something??????? That is the point here people why is one immediately a lair and the other honest Sam? I said earlier I agree birdshot at a distance is harmless... But can it be proved that is what he shot?????? I have said multiple times I do think the drone owner should have been over his property but my point is the reaction from the owner.
Kicker to me is if I had just discharged 3 shot gun rounds in the air I don't think I would be getting that hostile with police. I would think I would be trying to deescalate and explain and save my butt from going to jail......
Yea, going to jail is nothing to be upset about.
TAKE THE LAW INTO HIS OWN HANDS????????Fate0n3 wrote:OK let's say for a 100% you are correct like I said I dunno I do not believe in speculation but let's play this game u are correct does that give him the right to take the law into his hands???Toddstang wrote:Lets see, HMMM, neighbors (Witnesses) seem to have the same story as drone shooter, drone pilot has been changing his story 2 times and never turned over SD card to prove his innocence. SD card even damaged will still hold info.Fate0n3 wrote:I guess people just read what they want.....u guys are immediately taking that the drone is a liar and the gun shooter is being honest with what he shot. What if he wasn't shooting bird shot and it was something??????? That is the point here people why is one immediately a lair and the other honest Sam? I said earlier I agree birdshot at a distance is harmless... But can it be proved that is what he shot?????? I have said multiple times I do think the drone owner should have been over his property but my point is the reaction from the owner.
Kicker to me is if I had just discharged 3 shot gun rounds in the air I don't think I would be getting that hostile with police. I would think I would be trying to deescalate and explain and save my butt from going to jail......
Yea, going to jail is nothing to be upset about.
So another scenario since u seem to be for this....a person is spying into ur neighbors (WHY NEIGHBORS? Getting dumb here)house do you....
A. Call the police
B. Get a firearm and shot them
C. Take him/her to dinner
D. Wonder what they ate for dinner
E. Shoot the vehicle's tire they are in
My point is I don't and you don't know the truth we are reading what is being shown to us. But the biggest point is the discharge of a firearm in an unsafe direction.