Are 'super bugs" linked to meat we eat?

Want to discuss politics, religious affairs, legal items, this would be the place. Keep the discourse civil please.
User avatar
ChopperDoc
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 5778
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:14 pm
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Are 'super bugs" linked to meat we eat?

Post by ChopperDoc » Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:54 am

When Dr. Stuart Levy, professor of medicine at Tufts University School of Medicine, first sounded the alarm about antibiotic use in livestock back in the late 1970s, U.S. health officials and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) turned a deaf ear.

Warning that the excessive use of antibiotics in livestock was “naïve and cavalier,” Levy predicted that the practice would result in antibiotic-resistant superbugs that could pose a dangerous threat. Despite a significant body of science supporting his concerns, the USDA, which functions as the promotional board for the meat and dairy industries, did nothing.

Today, Levy’s nightmare scenario has come to pass, and still U.S. officials are failing to address the ominous hazards of ongoing antibiotic use in livestock. Even now, when a direct connection between the use of antibiotics in livestock and the proliferation of super germs is well established, the USDA is failing to act, choosing instead to err on the side of meat industry profits.

In 1949, Dr. Thomas Jukes, a researcher for the American Cyanamid Corporation, discovered that feeding animals small doses of the antibiotic chlortetracycline caused chickens and piglets to gain 10 to 15 percent more weight than normal. This remarkable discovery gave livestock producers a short-cut to higher livestock profits while saving on feed costs. Within a few short years, “subtherapeutic” doses of antibiotics were being routinely administered to poultry, hogs and cattle.

Not only did the antibiotics cause animals to gain weight more quickly, but they also helped to prevent infection. This meant that animals could be kept in more crowded spaces with less risk of infectious disease. The use of antibiotics allowed for what today is known as factory farming of livestock.

According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, approximately 70 percent of all antibiotics sold in the United States are used on healthy livestock. Globally, about half of the antibiotics produced are not used to improve human health, but for use in livestock.

When animals consume antibiotics on a regular basis, they develop antibiotic resistance. Consequently, when we eat meat from animals fed antibiotics, we develop antibiotic resistance as well. Meat does not contain antibiotics, but meat tissue imparts plasmids – b bits of genetic material – that transfer antibiotic resistance to humans. The result? Resistance to antibiotics in humans. Thus, the number of superbugs that do not respond to antibiotics is growing, and more and more people cannot be helped by these once miracle drugs.

Each year in the United States, approximately two million pounds of manure produced by livestock contaminate groundwater and soil. As early as 2002, the U.S. Geological Survey reported antibiotics in 48 percent of streams tested nationwide. Almost half of the streams tested were downstream from agricultural operations. This widespread contamination of soil and water increases the risk of antibiotic resistance in humans. And this means that we are prime targets for a global pandemic of supergerms.

In 1998, the European Union took a strong position on antibiotics, banning the use of these drugs for growth promotion in livestock. This has resulted in a steady decrease in antibiotic resistance in livestock and in humans. As early as 30 years ago, the FDA attempted to ban the use of subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics in livestock, but the move was crushed by pharmaceutical and farming lobbyists. The USDA, maintaining a pro-profits position relative to the livestock industry, has failed to budge on the issues of antibiotics in livestock production, despite ominous warnings from health officials around the world, and an increasing number of superbugs.

So where do we stand? Potent and lethal bacteria like NDM-1, MRSA, Clostridium difficile, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumonia do not respond to most drugs. These once life-saving medical agents are useless in an increasing number of cases. As long as animals for human consumption are fed massive quantities of drugs, this trend will continue.

Eating certified organic meats will help to reduce the amount of plasmids you consume, but many germs out there are already dangerous and drug-resistant, so this may actually do little good. Taking health precautions, such as thoroughly washing your hands and keeping away from others who are sick, will help. However, germs are everywhere, on virtually all handles, railings, and public fixtures – from gas pumps to restaurant salt shakers. Unless you wear a biohazard suit or live in a sterile environment, you are exposed to germs on a constant basis.

In the instance of antibiotic use in livestock and the promotion of lethal pathogens, individual behavior is less effective than policy change. As Levy and other health officials have warned, either the practice of feeding antibiotics to livestock must come to an end, or the consequences could be dire.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/03/1 ... z2NXAMe3zN
"You rarely rise to the occasion, you usually just sink to your lowest level of training."

User avatar
ssracer
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13804
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: KY
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 61 times
Contact:

Re: Are 'super bugs" linked to meat we eat?

Post by ssracer » Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:04 pm

Interesting...and scary

Geno
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 1453
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:19 pm
Location: Louisville
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 17 times

Re: Are 'super bugs" linked to meat we eat?

Post by Geno » Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:16 pm

From what I have read, long term low-dose exposure to many things can either reduce efficacy and put others at risk of allergic reactions. Most do not know that Luden`s cough drops of old used to have small amounts of penicillin in them. The idea was that the new, at the time, wonder drug could help people with coughs colds etc... It is supposed that many became exposed and "sensitized" to penicillin, later to be allergic to it. Who knows? The modern super bugs are merely the older bugs that have become resistant to current antibiotics. This is why antibiotics may not always be the answer to a sore throat or other maladies. If you want to decrease the effects, USE ALL OF THE ANTIBIOTICS AS THEY ARE PRESCRIBED! Do not stop when you begin to feel better, you have only killed off the susceptible bugs (easy killed) the "wonder bugs" are the ones left around when you stop taking the meds. There are bugs around now that are only susceptible to Vancomycin. A real heavy hitter. Sometimes surgery is used to remove affected tissue to reduce the need for antibiotics. I am sure Gunning Badger can correct any of the mistakes I may have stated. I am long out of school and just trying to keep up! Don't give up hope, newer meds are coming, but use common sense in asking for and taking any meds. Geno
I know not what the future holds, but I know Who holds the future.

Neither Welfare nor political office were intended to be a career path!

renovatio
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:48 pm
Location: louisville
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Are 'super bugs" linked to meat we eat?

Post by renovatio » Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:25 pm

There's a lot more than "superbugs" linked to the meat we eat. Anyone that has yet to watch Forks over Knives, you need to watch it. I'm not a vegan by any stretch, and probably will never be- but it is one of the most compelling documentaries I've ever seen.
We have learned better than that, and know it more, for it is waking that understands sleep and not sleep that understands waking. -C.S. Lewis

Return to “Legal/Politics/Religious”

×