Re: Fleshlight opinion (just write answer first and then why
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:38 pm
I was offended!jackalo626 wrote:It was edited and not funny, well sorta lol.WLJ wrote:Nice thread title
For firearms enthusiasts from lovers of Glock, AR-15, XD, 1911s, shotguns, AK-47s, to black powder. For shooters, hunters, LEO'S, military, or casual enthusiasts. KAC is about firearms, and all the good things in life. Welcome!
https://www.kentuckyarmoryclub.com/
https://www.kentuckyarmoryclub.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=19995
I was offended!jackalo626 wrote:It was edited and not funny, well sorta lol.WLJ wrote:Nice thread title
That seems to always pop on my radar.86 slo-vo wrote:Fenix UC35.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, having a low output for the more likely scenario of changing a tire at night, lost keys, or looking for treasure at night where you think a drug trafficker might have buried it are a more realistic. 320 lumens for 4ft distance is overkill. Plus the batteries lasting more than 2 hours is a bonus by lowering the output.Frailer wrote:As I re-read this thread I realized I might have misunderstood the question.
If you're asking for opinions of the two lights you mentioned, I can only comment on the Surefire G2X Pro. It's the light I keep in my glovebox; had it for 5-6 years, and I've never had an issue with it. I usually like my lights to have a single output level, but for a general use light, the low output option is convenient. No need to blind yourself when looking for something.
As an aside, my old 6Z is still going strong after 15+ years of hard use. I replaced the head with a Malkoff LED, but not out of necessity.