Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good reason

Want to discuss politics, religious affairs, legal items, this would be the place. Keep the discourse civil please.
User avatar
WLJ
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 30658
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
Location: Epsilon Eridani System
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 110 times

Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good reason

Post by WLJ » Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:35 pm

State & Local - POLITICS
Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good reason,' rules Maryland law unconstitutional

Published March 05, 2012

| FoxNews.com


Gun Rights

AP

BALTIMORE – Maryland residents do not have to provide a "good and substantial reason" to legally own a handgun, a federal judge ruled Monday, striking down as unconstitutional the state's requirements for getting a permit.

U.S. District Judge Benson Everett Legg wrote that states are allowed some leeway in deciding the way residents exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms, but Maryland's objective was to limit the number of firearms that individuals could carry, effectively creating a rationing system that rewarded those who provided the right answer for wanting to own a gun.

"A citizen may not be required to offer a 'good and substantial reason' why he should be permitted to exercise his rights," Legg wrote. "The right's existence is all the reason he needs."

Plaintiff Raymond Woollard obtained a handgun permit after fighting with an intruder in his Hampstead home in 2002, but was denied a renewal in 2009 because he could not show he had been subject to "threats occurring beyond his residence."

Woollard appealed, but his appeal was rejected by the review board, which found he hadn't demonstrated a "good and substantial reason" to carry a handgun as a reasonable precaution. The suit filed in 2010 claimed that Maryland didn't have a reason to deny the renewal and wrongly put the burden on Woollard to show why he still needed to carry a gun.

"People have the right to carry a gun for self-defense and don't have to prove that there's a special reason for them to seek the permit," said his attorney Alan Gura, who has challenged handgun bans in the District of Columbia and Chicago as an attorney with the Second Amendment Foundation. "We're not against the idea of a permit process, but the licensing system has to acknowledge that there's a right to bear arms."

In his ruling, Legg wrote that Second Amendment protections aren't limited to the household.

"In addition to self-defense, the (Second Amendment) right was also understood to allow for militia membership and hunting. To secure these rights, the Second Amendment's protections must extend beyond the home: neither hunting nor militia training is a household activity, and 'self-defense has to take place wherever (a) person happens to be,'" Legg wrote.

"Judge Legg's ruling takes a substantial step toward restoring the Second Amendment to its rightful place in the Bill of Rights and provides gun owners with another significant victory," said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. "The federal district court has carefully spelled out the obvious, that the Second Amendment does not stop at one's doorstep, but protects us wherever we have a right to be."

The lawsuit names the state police superintendent and members of the Handgun Permit Review Board as defendants. A spokesman from Maryland's attorney general's office was not immediately available to comment.

Many states require gun permits, but six states, including Maryland, issue permits on a discretionary basis, Gura said. In most of those states, these challenges have not succeeded in U.S. District Courts, but they are being appealed, he said.

"Most states that choose to regulate the right to bear arms have licensing systems that are objective and straightforward," Gura said. "That's all that we want for Maryland."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03 ... z1oHhUgtRl
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13309
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 56 times

Re: Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good rea

Post by Rem700 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:14 pm

+1,000,000 for that judge

User avatar
Nolan
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:50 pm
Location: INDIANA
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good rea

Post by Nolan » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:45 am

East coast is getting with program for a change
"To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them."

-- George Mason, speech of June 14, 1788


Image

User avatar
Wyldman
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Spring, TX
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good rea

Post by Wyldman » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:42 am

It's about damned time a sitting judge showed some common sense! Too few do, of late!
IN GOD WE TRUST

"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."


renovatio
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:48 pm
Location: louisville
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good rea

Post by renovatio » Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:31 pm

Another win here

http://kdvr.com/2012/03/05/court-studen ... -on-campus

Glad some parts of our country are regaining sanity
We have learned better than that, and know it more, for it is waking that understands sleep and not sleep that understands waking. -C.S. Lewis

jackalo626
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 12053
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:50 pm
Location: Louisville
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good rea

Post by jackalo626 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:00 pm

Common sense prevails!

User avatar
Wyldman
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Spring, TX
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good rea

Post by Wyldman » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:02 pm

Jackalo626 wrote:Common sense prevails, for a change!

Fixed it for you.
IN GOD WE TRUST

"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."

User avatar
drifter0069
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:09 pm
Location: Louisville, KY
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good rea

Post by drifter0069 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:03 pm

VERY glad to see stories like this.

Return to “Legal/Politics/Religious”

×