Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Want to discuss politics, religious affairs, legal items, this would be the place. Keep the discourse civil please.
User avatar
gaston_kalash
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:09 pm
Location: somerset
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by gaston_kalash » Fri Jul 04, 2014 3:08 pm

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/07/03/ ... ng-pistol/
Looks like the military is going into this again

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
SI JE PUIS

User avatar
son of liberty
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 1759
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:22 pm
Location: Carrollton
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by son of liberty » Fri Jul 04, 2014 3:30 pm

Its the same old problem, everyone wants a more powerful handgun round with the least amount of recoil. The problem really comes down to application, and training, of course im speaking from a civilian standpoint never having to have used a handgun in combat or self defense. For most the 9mm is the perfect blend of control and power, for some its not, either way the same results should be expected and trained for. This is why drills like "Shoot em to the ground" and the "1-5 drill" are used for more then just handgun rounds.

I would not be a bit shocked to find them go 9mm again with an updated loading and a new plastic handgun.
Image

User avatar
WLJ
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 30583
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
Location: Epsilon Eridani System
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by WLJ » Fri Jul 04, 2014 3:58 pm

Image
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.

User avatar
Jff24Gordn
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:14 pm
Location: Hodgenville
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Jff24Gordn » Fri Jul 04, 2014 7:05 pm

Mark 23

/thread

User avatar
Dustin
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 3143
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:47 pm
Location: Lost in Space
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 40 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Dustin » Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:09 pm

10mm that is all
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." Thomas Jefferson

jackalo626
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 12053
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:50 pm
Location: Louisville
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by jackalo626 » Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:11 pm

Dustin wrote:10mm that is all
word

User avatar
Toddstang
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 13875
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 98 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Toddstang » Sat Jul 05, 2014 12:05 am

jackalo626 wrote:
Dustin wrote:10mm that is all
word
Double word.

User avatar
Wyldman
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Spring, TX
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Wyldman » Sat Jul 05, 2014 6:58 am

Let's try the gyro-jet again, that was an utter failure.
IN GOD WE TRUST

"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."

User avatar
Toecutter1978
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 10474
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:08 pm
Location: Brooks
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Toecutter1978 » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:15 am

Can somebody say a sidearm chambered with a rifle caliber, oh yeah!

Beretta doesn't want to loose that contract at all, it's not like they have a huge civilian following

User avatar
DDgunslinger
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:10 pm
Location: Louisville
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0
Contact:

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by DDgunslinger » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:29 am

Problem: 9mm isn't the issue, being force to use ball ammo is the issue. As for the M9 platform, it can get scraped entirely.

Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.

User avatar
Wyldman
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Spring, TX
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Wyldman » Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:15 am

Hollow point & dum-dum ammo is outlawed by the Geneva Convention. Jacketed ball is the only allowed projectile.

From the Wyldphone
IN GOD WE TRUST

"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."

User avatar
WLJ
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 30583
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
Location: Epsilon Eridani System
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by WLJ » Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:18 am

Wyldman wrote:Hollow point & dum-dum ammo is outlawed by the Geneva Convention. Jacketed ball is the only allowed projectile.

From the Wyldphone
Hague Convention of 1899 actually, The Geneva Convention has to do with POWs and non-combatants.
BTW: The USA never actually sign it,
Last edited by WLJ on Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.

User avatar
Wyldman
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:01 pm
Location: Spring, TX
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Wyldman » Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:19 am

You are correct, my confusion got the better of me. Need to sleep at night.

From the Wyldphone
IN GOD WE TRUST

"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."

User avatar
DDgunslinger
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:10 pm
Location: Louisville
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0
Contact:

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by DDgunslinger » Sat Jul 05, 2014 11:09 am

WLJ wrote:
Wyldman wrote:Hollow point & dum-dum ammo is outlawed by the Geneva Convention. Jacketed ball is the only allowed projectile.

From the Wyldphone
Hague Convention of 1899 actually, The Geneva Convention has to do with POWs and non-combatants.
BTW: The USA never actually sign it,
That's my point, so why comply with it.

User avatar
Whootsinator
Little Butthole
Posts: 3128
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Northern Kentucky
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Whootsinator » Sat Jul 05, 2014 11:27 am

The military doesn't know what it wants.
"I don't retreat; I kick ass in the other direction."

User avatar
MLH40324
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:00 pm
Location: Louisville
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by MLH40324 » Sat Jul 05, 2014 8:16 pm

M9 is too big. I bet a 9mm on smaller platform will be the solution. With Combat Arms open to all genders, now the ergonomics and fit of the new pistol will probably have to accommodate smaller hands.

User avatar
Toecutter1978
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 10474
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:08 pm
Location: Brooks
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Toecutter1978 » Sat Jul 05, 2014 11:14 pm

It will be a combat super soaker.

User avatar
Toddstang
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 13875
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 98 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Toddstang » Sat Jul 05, 2014 11:55 pm

They need to size people up to weapons and not a one size fits all. Just like the runt in a squad wont be carrying a SAW.

User avatar
son of liberty
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 1759
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:22 pm
Location: Carrollton
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by son of liberty » Sat Jul 05, 2014 11:57 pm

DDgunslinger wrote:Problem: 9mm isn't the issue, being force to use ball ammo is the issue. As for the M9 platform, it can get scraped entirely.

Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.

One of the only times you will hear me say this, They should go with the S&W M&P not the Glock. I say this for a few reasons, you could get them with a thumb safety, so you could please both them who like them and them who dont. Its an American made product by an American company, it just seems right. They already have or could supply slides cut for Red dot as well as extended , threaded barrels, and while I dont think its needed all the time , it would be nice if the sharp edge had the option without altering the firearm.

Let me be clear about this though, I am a Glock fan boy , go glock or go home.
Image

User avatar
Jakob
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:53 pm
Location: Louisville, KY
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Jakob » Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:52 pm

Toddstang wrote:They need to size people up to weapons and not a one size fits all. Just like the runt in a squad wont be carrying a SAW.
IMO, everyone in a fire team should carry a SAW... but to get back on track.

The reports I read are saying that the M9 platform is getting more expensive to maintain than it would be to replace them. I don't have a huge problem with the M9, but I don't have extensive use with it, but something about it doesn't fit me.
Livewire wrote:I remember when this was a free country and not a fascist one filled with limp wristed, tender hearted, liver lipped bunch of whiny ass cry babies.

User avatar
Toecutter1978
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 10474
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:08 pm
Location: Brooks
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Toecutter1978 » Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:09 pm

I had problems with magazines, springs worn out, even in new ones. I never really cared for it. Hopefully the next platform will begging back to the 1911, now that gets the juices going

User avatar
WLJ
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 30583
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
Location: Epsilon Eridani System
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by WLJ » Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:26 pm

People wanting to go back to the 1911 makes me think of Jurassic Park. I mean, don't get me wrong I love the 1911, but I don't think the mil is going to consider a low cap single action.
Last edited by WLJ on Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.

User avatar
WLJ
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 30583
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
Location: Epsilon Eridani System
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by WLJ » Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:29 pm

son of liberty wrote:
DDgunslinger wrote:Problem: 9mm isn't the issue, being force to use ball ammo is the issue. As for the M9 platform, it can get scraped entirely.

Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.

One of the only times you will hear me say this, They should go with the S&W M&P not the Glock. I say this for a few reasons, you could get them with a thumb safety, so you could please both them who like them and them who dont. Its an American made product by an American company, it just seems right. They already have or could supply slides cut for Red dot as well as extended , threaded barrels, and while I dont think its needed all the time , it would be nice if the sharp edge had the option without altering the firearm.

Let me be clear about this though, I am a Glock fan boy , go glock or go home.
The M&P, one of the most overlooked firearms of today IMO.
BTW: Anyone considered something along the lines of a CZ-75? Which is another overlooked firearm in IMO.
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.

User avatar
Jakob
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:53 pm
Location: Louisville, KY
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Jakob » Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:25 pm

WLJ wrote:
son of liberty wrote:
DDgunslinger wrote:Problem: 9mm isn't the issue, being force to use ball ammo is the issue. As for the M9 platform, it can get scraped entirely.

Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.

One of the only times you will hear me say this, They should go with the S&W M&P not the Glock. I say this for a few reasons, you could get them with a thumb safety, so you could please both them who like them and them who dont. Its an American made product by an American company, it just seems right. They already have or could supply slides cut for Red dot as well as extended , threaded barrels, and while I dont think its needed all the time , it would be nice if the sharp edge had the option without altering the firearm.

Let me be clear about this though, I am a Glock fan boy , go glock or go home.
The M&P, one of the most overlooked firearms of today IMO.
BTW: Anyone considered something along the lines of a CZ-75? Which is another overlooked firearm in IMO.
I love my CZ-75B (clone) except for the location of the mag release. It is also an internal slide (polymer frame) and could be difficult to manipulate with combat gloves.
Livewire wrote:I remember when this was a free country and not a fascist one filled with limp wristed, tender hearted, liver lipped bunch of whiny ass cry babies.

User avatar
Niceguy
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 14198
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Smithfield Ky
Has liked: 327 times
Been liked: 92 times

Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol

Post by Niceguy » Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:19 pm

I agree with SOL about the M&P 100%. I also think it's stupid not having American made products for our American military.

Return to “Legal/Politics/Religious”

×