Military wants a harder hitting pistol
- gaston_kalash
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:09 pm
- Location: somerset
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Military wants a harder hitting pistol
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/07/03/ ... ng-pistol/
Looks like the military is going into this again
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Looks like the military is going into this again
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
SI JE PUIS
- son of liberty
- KAC Member
- Posts: 1759
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:22 pm
- Location: Carrollton
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
Its the same old problem, everyone wants a more powerful handgun round with the least amount of recoil. The problem really comes down to application, and training, of course im speaking from a civilian standpoint never having to have used a handgun in combat or self defense. For most the 9mm is the perfect blend of control and power, for some its not, either way the same results should be expected and trained for. This is why drills like "Shoot em to the ground" and the "1-5 drill" are used for more then just handgun rounds.
I would not be a bit shocked to find them go 9mm again with an updated loading and a new plastic handgun.
I would not be a bit shocked to find them go 9mm again with an updated loading and a new plastic handgun.
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30583
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- Jff24Gordn
- KAC Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:14 pm
- Location: Hodgenville
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
- Dustin
- KAC Member
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:47 pm
- Location: Lost in Space
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 40 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
10mm that is all
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." Thomas Jefferson
-
- Global Mod
- Posts: 12053
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:50 pm
- Location: Louisville
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 22 times
- Toecutter1978
- KAC Member
- Posts: 10474
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:08 pm
- Location: Brooks
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 14 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
Can somebody say a sidearm chambered with a rifle caliber, oh yeah!
Beretta doesn't want to loose that contract at all, it's not like they have a huge civilian following
Beretta doesn't want to loose that contract at all, it's not like they have a huge civilian following
- DDgunslinger
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:10 pm
- Location: Louisville
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
Problem: 9mm isn't the issue, being force to use ball ammo is the issue. As for the M9 platform, it can get scraped entirely.
Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.
Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.
- Wyldman
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:01 pm
- Location: Spring, TX
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
Hollow point & dum-dum ammo is outlawed by the Geneva Convention. Jacketed ball is the only allowed projectile.
From the Wyldphone
From the Wyldphone
IN GOD WE TRUST
"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."
"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30583
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
Hague Convention of 1899 actually, The Geneva Convention has to do with POWs and non-combatants.Wyldman wrote:Hollow point & dum-dum ammo is outlawed by the Geneva Convention. Jacketed ball is the only allowed projectile.
From the Wyldphone
BTW: The USA never actually sign it,
Last edited by WLJ on Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- Wyldman
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:01 pm
- Location: Spring, TX
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
You are correct, my confusion got the better of me. Need to sleep at night.
From the Wyldphone
From the Wyldphone
IN GOD WE TRUST
"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."
"That boy's paradigm don't always add up to four nickels...."
- DDgunslinger
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:10 pm
- Location: Louisville
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
That's my point, so why comply with it.WLJ wrote:Hague Convention of 1899 actually, The Geneva Convention has to do with POWs and non-combatants.Wyldman wrote:Hollow point & dum-dum ammo is outlawed by the Geneva Convention. Jacketed ball is the only allowed projectile.
From the Wyldphone
BTW: The USA never actually sign it,
- Whootsinator
- Little Butthole
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:04 am
- Location: Northern Kentucky
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
The military doesn't know what it wants.
"I don't retreat; I kick ass in the other direction."
- MLH40324
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:00 pm
- Location: Louisville
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 1 time
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
M9 is too big. I bet a 9mm on smaller platform will be the solution. With Combat Arms open to all genders, now the ergonomics and fit of the new pistol will probably have to accommodate smaller hands.
- Toecutter1978
- KAC Member
- Posts: 10474
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:08 pm
- Location: Brooks
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 14 times
- Toddstang
- Global Mod
- Posts: 13875
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
- Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
- Has liked: 145 times
- Been liked: 98 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
They need to size people up to weapons and not a one size fits all. Just like the runt in a squad wont be carrying a SAW.
- son of liberty
- KAC Member
- Posts: 1759
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:22 pm
- Location: Carrollton
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
DDgunslinger wrote:Problem: 9mm isn't the issue, being force to use ball ammo is the issue. As for the M9 platform, it can get scraped entirely.
Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.
One of the only times you will hear me say this, They should go with the S&W M&P not the Glock. I say this for a few reasons, you could get them with a thumb safety, so you could please both them who like them and them who dont. Its an American made product by an American company, it just seems right. They already have or could supply slides cut for Red dot as well as extended , threaded barrels, and while I dont think its needed all the time , it would be nice if the sharp edge had the option without altering the firearm.
Let me be clear about this though, I am a Glock fan boy , go glock or go home.
- Jakob
- KAC Member
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:53 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
IMO, everyone in a fire team should carry a SAW... but to get back on track.Toddstang wrote:They need to size people up to weapons and not a one size fits all. Just like the runt in a squad wont be carrying a SAW.
The reports I read are saying that the M9 platform is getting more expensive to maintain than it would be to replace them. I don't have a huge problem with the M9, but I don't have extensive use with it, but something about it doesn't fit me.
Livewire wrote:I remember when this was a free country and not a fascist one filled with limp wristed, tender hearted, liver lipped bunch of whiny ass cry babies.
- Toecutter1978
- KAC Member
- Posts: 10474
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 8:08 pm
- Location: Brooks
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 14 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
I had problems with magazines, springs worn out, even in new ones. I never really cared for it. Hopefully the next platform will begging back to the 1911, now that gets the juices going
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30583
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
People wanting to go back to the 1911 makes me think of Jurassic Park. I mean, don't get me wrong I love the 1911, but I don't think the mil is going to consider a low cap single action.
Last edited by WLJ on Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30583
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
The M&P, one of the most overlooked firearms of today IMO.son of liberty wrote:DDgunslinger wrote:Problem: 9mm isn't the issue, being force to use ball ammo is the issue. As for the M9 platform, it can get scraped entirely.
Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.
One of the only times you will hear me say this, They should go with the S&W M&P not the Glock. I say this for a few reasons, you could get them with a thumb safety, so you could please both them who like them and them who dont. Its an American made product by an American company, it just seems right. They already have or could supply slides cut for Red dot as well as extended , threaded barrels, and while I dont think its needed all the time , it would be nice if the sharp edge had the option without altering the firearm.
Let me be clear about this though, I am a Glock fan boy , go glock or go home.
BTW: Anyone considered something along the lines of a CZ-75? Which is another overlooked firearm in IMO.
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- Jakob
- KAC Member
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:53 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
I love my CZ-75B (clone) except for the location of the mag release. It is also an internal slide (polymer frame) and could be difficult to manipulate with combat gloves.WLJ wrote:The M&P, one of the most overlooked firearms of today IMO.son of liberty wrote:DDgunslinger wrote:Problem: 9mm isn't the issue, being force to use ball ammo is the issue. As for the M9 platform, it can get scraped entirely.
Solution: Fuck the GC and use quality HP ammo and 9mm is still very much a viable option. Then ditch the M9, replace it with a G17 that is simple, easy and extremely reliable.
One of the only times you will hear me say this, They should go with the S&W M&P not the Glock. I say this for a few reasons, you could get them with a thumb safety, so you could please both them who like them and them who dont. Its an American made product by an American company, it just seems right. They already have or could supply slides cut for Red dot as well as extended , threaded barrels, and while I dont think its needed all the time , it would be nice if the sharp edge had the option without altering the firearm.
Let me be clear about this though, I am a Glock fan boy , go glock or go home.
BTW: Anyone considered something along the lines of a CZ-75? Which is another overlooked firearm in IMO.
Livewire wrote:I remember when this was a free country and not a fascist one filled with limp wristed, tender hearted, liver lipped bunch of whiny ass cry babies.
- Niceguy
- KAC Member
- Posts: 14198
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:57 pm
- Location: Smithfield Ky
- Has liked: 327 times
- Been liked: 92 times
Re: Military wants a harder hitting pistol
I agree with SOL about the M&P 100%. I also think it's stupid not having American made products for our American military.