New Remington R-51

Post by **Bama** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 3:18 am

I am interested in this new compact. Even more interested if the other new Glock isn't 9mm....
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014 ... 51-pistol/

1fastmach1 · Post by **1fastmach1** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:40 am

That thing is uggggggly. I'd pack it if it was a nice piece though. I'm not really concerned with looks in a firearm.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.

Post by **Marcus** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:00 am

Interesting for sure, but not really that small. I don't think it's terrible looking.

Post by **86 slo-vo** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:15 am

So Remington is putting out a single stack 9....before glock....SMH.

It is pretty ugly, I'd like to see the insides.

Post by **jackalo626** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:08 am

1fastmach1 wrote:That thing is uggggggly. I'd pack it if it was a nice piece though. I'm not really concerned with looks in a firearm.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.

Same feelings here. I still like my larger capacity handguns but this would be a great casual carry gun when I need something lighter as if in sweatpants or nylon shorts in the summer with no belt loops. It would not be my primary carry gun but I would give it a shot (no pun intended), especially for a retail price sub $400.

Post by **WLJ** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:09 am

Come on, it's not that bad, in fact I kind of like it.

Post by **drifter0069** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:18 am

I think it looks pretty cool. I would own one if the reviews were good. Wouldn't want one of the first runs, let the bugs get worked out first.

Double-post sent from my iphone with Tapatalk...

Post by **jackalo626** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:45 am

WLJ wrote:Come on, it's not that bad, in fact I kind of like it.

Honestly most people think bullpups are ugly as dog poop but you like them so you must know your taste is eclectic/different... This thing is ugly.

Post by **jackalo626** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:46 am

drifter0069 wrote:I think it looks pretty cool. I would own one if the reviews were good. Wouldn't want one of the first runs, let the bugs get worked out first.

Double-post sent from my iphone with Tapatalk...

Bugs worked out? C'mon man this isn't a Springfield Armory!!!!! :llama:

Post by **WLJ** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 10:00 am

jackalo626 wrote:
WLJ wrote:Come on, it's not that bad, in fact I kind of like it.
Honestly most people think bullpups are ugly as dog poop but you like them so you must know your taste is eclectic/different... This thing is ugly.

You like Glocks right? Enough said.

Post by **jackalo626** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 11:38 am

WLJ wrote:
jackalo626 wrote:
WLJ wrote:Come on, it's not that bad, in fact I kind of like it.
Honestly most people think bullpups are ugly as dog poop but you like them so you must know your taste is eclectic/different... This thing is ugly.
You like Glocks right? Enough said.

No not enough said. I am not saying your taste is wrong, I am saying it is not what is considered common which is why you have told me you like bullpups. I do like Glocks for the same reason I said I'd give this a try and that's because they function reliably. I don't think Glocks are beautiful but something is to be said of simplicity. This gun has tried to make itself into something pleasing to the eye. I still don't pick guns for aesthetics but it is a bonus when they aren't ugly.

Post by **WLJ** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:15 pm

Post by **Dustin** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:40 pm

Reminds me of colt 1903 or 1908 with the hammer and grip safety. I want to see on but it might on want list.

Post by **WLJ** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:30 pm

jackalo626 wrote:
WLJ wrote:
jackalo626 wrote:
WLJ wrote:Come on, it's not that bad, in fact I kind of like it.
Honestly most people think bullpups are ugly as dog poop but you like them so you must know your taste is eclectic/different... This thing is ugly.
You like Glocks right? Enough said.
No not enough said. I am not saying your taste is wrong, I am saying it is not what is considered common which is why you have told me you like bullpups. I do like Glocks for the same reason I said I'd give this a try and that's because they function reliably. I don't think Glocks are beautiful but something is to be said of simplicity. This gun has tried to make itself into something pleasing to the eye. I still don't pick guns for aesthetics but it is a bonus when they aren't ugly.

Glock lover

:llama:

Post by **Toddstang** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:28 pm

UGLY!!!

Post by **bigelowe** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:27 pm

Looks like a makarov and a ruger sr9/lc9 had a baby. Sub $400 I may try it though

Post by **Toddstang** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:29 pm

bigelowe wrote:Looks like a makarov and a ruger sr9/lc9 had a baby. Sub $400 I may try it though

Looks more like the blaster guns on the Buzz LightYear ride at Disney.

Post by **etownguy** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:39 pm

It kind of looks Luke that chaparel??? Pistol the one that got recalled this summer

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk

Post by **justang1997** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:43 pm

I like the way it looks. A lot.

Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk 2

Post by **WLJ** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:46 pm

See, I'm not the only one.

Post by **justang1997** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:09 pm

I bet it carries like a dream. All dehorned and stuff. I don't like low capacity guns but if the price really is sub $400 I could see me buying one for fun.

Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk 2

Post by **bigelowe** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:32 pm

Toddstang wrote:
bigelowe wrote:Looks like a makarov and a ruger sr9/lc9 had a baby. Sub $400 I may try it though
Looks more like the blaster guns on the Buzz LightYear ride at Disney.

I shoot lights out on that ride. I guess I will have to get one for competition pistol. HAhahaha

Kentucky Armory Club