A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:26 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown, Ky
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
Why are the majority of rifles that are chambered in .223 ONLY chambered for .223 and not 5.56/.223??
I have a Savage Axis in .223. Have called Savage on it when I saw that Bud's advertised it as 5.56/.223. Savage told me that it is .223 only.
I'd like to have a Ruger American and here is where it gets odd. They offer the RAR Ranch in 5.56/.223, but none of the other RAR models are offered as such, only in .223.
While I am not versed in ballistics I do understand that the 5.56 round is slightly different in its shell casing and also generates higher chamber pressure than the .223.
Is it possible to have a bolt action rifle that is currently chambered for .223 ONLY to be altered/reamed to accept and safely use 5.56 ammunition??
Thanks,
BK
I have a Savage Axis in .223. Have called Savage on it when I saw that Bud's advertised it as 5.56/.223. Savage told me that it is .223 only.
I'd like to have a Ruger American and here is where it gets odd. They offer the RAR Ranch in 5.56/.223, but none of the other RAR models are offered as such, only in .223.
While I am not versed in ballistics I do understand that the 5.56 round is slightly different in its shell casing and also generates higher chamber pressure than the .223.
Is it possible to have a bolt action rifle that is currently chambered for .223 ONLY to be altered/reamed to accept and safely use 5.56 ammunition??
Thanks,
BK
God made man.
Samuel Colt made all men equal.
John M. Browning and the 1911 made some men more equal than others.
Samuel Colt made all men equal.
John M. Browning and the 1911 made some men more equal than others.
-
- Founding Father
- Posts: 7009
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:40 pm
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
I don't think reaming would make a difference... unless I'm thinking of it wrong.
It's more of a pressure issue....
Never understood why manufactures don't make more bolt guns that are rated 5.56 though
It's more of a pressure issue....
Never understood why manufactures don't make more bolt guns that are rated 5.56 though
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."(Edmund Burke)
-
- Founding Father
- Posts: 7009
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:40 pm
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
Also know there's a lot of folks that swear there's very little difference in most 5.56/223 rounds...
Edit: when it comes to pressure on chamber, ballistics etc
Edit: when it comes to pressure on chamber, ballistics etc
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."(Edmund Burke)
- Dustin
- KAC Member
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:47 pm
- Location: Lost in Space
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 40 times
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
Paging Cranky
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." Thomas Jefferson
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:26 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown, Ky
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
The reason I mention reaming the chamber is this tool for AR-15 chambers offered by MICHIGUNS:JustShootIt wrote:I don't think reaming would make a difference... unless I'm thinking of it wrong.
It's more of a pressure issue....
Never understood why manufactures don't make more bolt guns that are rated 5.56 though
http://www.m-guns.com/tools.php
The case size difference in the two calibers (5.56 and .223) is in the "leade" (?), throat and neck of the case (am I correct here??). Wondering if a tool like this could be used to modify a bolt-action .223 only chamber to accept 5.56 ammo (safely)??
BK
God made man.
Samuel Colt made all men equal.
John M. Browning and the 1911 made some men more equal than others.
Samuel Colt made all men equal.
John M. Browning and the 1911 made some men more equal than others.
- Whootsinator
- Little Butthole
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:04 am
- Location: Northern Kentucky
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
If you want to shoot 5.56 in your bolt rifle either pick one that already has a 5.56 chamber (there are a fair amount of options, but I forget most) or buy whatever you want and have the chamber reamed to true 5.56 dimensions. You can absolutely do that safely, and many people have done it before.
"I don't retreat; I kick ass in the other direction."
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
Or just shoot .223
Or shoot 5.56 in the .223 , you will know with one or two cases if you have a pressure problem.
The 5.56 has a longer throat than .223 same case size more or less.
Or shoot 5.56 in the .223 , you will know with one or two cases if you have a pressure problem.
The 5.56 has a longer throat than .223 same case size more or less.
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
5.56 is loaded to high pressure so belt feed machine guns will cycle with the same ammo as used in rifles.
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
Yes but I have used throating reamers for several decades in rebarreling bolt guns.BK Meyers wrote:The reason I mention reaming the chamber is this tool for AR-15 chambers offered by MICHIGUNS:JustShootIt wrote:I don't think reaming would make a difference... unless I'm thinking of it wrong.
It's more of a pressure issue....
Never understood why manufactures don't make more bolt guns that are rated 5.56 though
http://www.m-guns.com/tools.php
The case size difference in the two calibers (5.56 and .223) is in the "leade" (?), throat and neck of the case (am I correct here??). Wondering if a tool like this could be used to modify a bolt-action .223 only chamber to accept 5.56 ammo (safely)??
BK
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:26 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown, Ky
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
So are you suggesting that I run the risk if damaging the rifle and possible bodily injury to myself with this statement?? How would the pressure problem manifest itself if not thru damage??guncrank1 wrote:Or just shoot .223
Or shoot 5.56 in the .223 , you will know with one or two cases if you have a pressure problem.
Not trying to be an ass here, but I'm confused by this "try it and see if it blows up" testing method.
BK
God made man.
Samuel Colt made all men equal.
John M. Browning and the 1911 made some men more equal than others.
Samuel Colt made all men equal.
John M. Browning and the 1911 made some men more equal than others.
- Whootsinator
- Little Butthole
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:04 am
- Location: Northern Kentucky
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
A .223 chambered firearm that would catastrophically fail when firing 5.56 isn't a firearm I'd consider safe regardless of what you shoot through it. The differences between the two aren't so great that firing a 5.56 round in a .223 chamber will cause the gun to catastrophically fail. Instead you'll see signs of higher than ideal pressures, the same symptoms (like cratered firing pin marks on the primers, flattened primers, or popped primers) you'd probably see working up the maximum safe charge in a hand load.
Your best bet is going to be ensuring you have a 5.56 chamber... that said, and though I can't recommend it, test firing 5.56 through a .223 chamber then observing for signs of over pressure probably isn't going to result in damaged guns or appendages.
Your best bet is going to be ensuring you have a 5.56 chamber... that said, and though I can't recommend it, test firing 5.56 through a .223 chamber then observing for signs of over pressure probably isn't going to result in damaged guns or appendages.
"I don't retreat; I kick ass in the other direction."
- Whootsinator
- Little Butthole
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:04 am
- Location: Northern Kentucky
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
I'm sure I'm missing some, and some of these can be caused by other things. I'm not an expert.
Flattened primers
Bulging primers
Popped primers
Firing pin causing cratering
Extractor/ejector marks
Flattened primers
Bulging primers
Popped primers
Firing pin causing cratering
Extractor/ejector marks
"I don't retreat; I kick ass in the other direction."
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:26 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown, Ky
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
Thank you for the clarification(s). Very good info and much appreciated.Whootsinator wrote:A .223 chambered firearm that would catastrophically fail when firing 5.56 isn't a firearm I'd consider safe regardless of what you shoot through it. The differences between the two aren't so great that firing a 5.56 round in a .223 chamber will cause the gun to catastrophically fail. Instead you'll see signs of higher than ideal pressures, the same symptoms (like cratered firing pin marks on the primers, flattened primers, or popped primers) you'd probably see working up the maximum safe charge in a hand load.
Your best bet is going to be ensuring you have a 5.56 chamber... that said, and though I can't recommend it, test firing 5.56 through a .223 chamber then observing for signs of over pressure probably isn't going to result in damaged guns or appendages.
BK
God made man.
Samuel Colt made all men equal.
John M. Browning and the 1911 made some men more equal than others.
Samuel Colt made all men equal.
John M. Browning and the 1911 made some men more equal than others.
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30685
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
Many manufactures use an in between chamber spec to avoid problems and commonly use a proprietary name for theirs though Wylde is commonly used by many.
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
As YGG pointed out , your rifle could shoot 5.56 with no problem as it could have a longer throat or none.
It is up to you but one round of 5.56 will not cause a KAboom
It may prove you have a high pressure problem.
If you reload , you will know the signs
A sticking bolt on extraction
A primer that flows back in firing pin hole
Flatten primer
Cratering of primer pocket in case. Just like the picture in Whoots post.
It is up to you but one round of 5.56 will not cause a KAboom
It may prove you have a high pressure problem.
If you reload , you will know the signs
A sticking bolt on extraction
A primer that flows back in firing pin hole
Flatten primer
Cratering of primer pocket in case. Just like the picture in Whoots post.
Last edited by guncrank1 on Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
If you are Have little tolerance for expermitiation , I continue to suggest you stick to .223 or reload the 5.56 to .223 levels and modify the case.
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
If you desire a throating effort , renting a throater is much cheaper.
And a word of caution , it can be done but you should have experence to use a throater.
And a word of caution , it can be done but you should have experence to use a throater.
- son of liberty
- KAC Member
- Posts: 1759
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:22 pm
- Location: Carrollton
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: A bolt-action chambering question re: 5.56 and .223
In a bolt gun I would not have a 5.56 chamber, give me the nice tight 223 chamber any day!